Jun 28, 2009

Economic Impact – Population Ageing is a lot worse than “The Crisis”

We’ve been talking about it for a while, and now The Economist is discussing what impact aging populations will have on the world – what The Economist describes as “a slow burning fuse”.  Even though the economic crisis has taken focus of aging as an issue, the article clearly paints the major challenge looming for countries and organizations, especially in the developed world.  The image at left shows clearly just how much more economic impact this demographic change has than the current “crisis”. 

During discussions at the HCI Workforce Planning conference recently, one attendee stated that the economic crisis makes things riskier from a retirement perspective – now, rather than seeing older worker retirement patterns steadily impact as though down a sloping hill, the practitioner expressed concern that many would stay until an economic uptick, and then organizations would see exits more like plunging off a cliff.  This is a real threat to knowledge and skill transition, and to business continuity, especially where the potential retirees are heavily concentrated in management.  But still people use the economic cycle as an excuse to not worry…yet The Economist article clearly illustrates why we should still worry:

This is a slow-moving but relentless development that in time will have vast economic, social and political consequences. As yet, only a few countries with already-old populations are starting to notice the effects. But labor forces are now beginning to shrink and numbers of pensioners are starting to rise. By about 2020 ageing will be plain for all to see. And there is no escape: barring huge natural or man-made disasters, demographic changes are much more certain than other long-term predictions (for example, of climate change). Every one of the 2 billion people who will be over 60 in 2050 has already been born.

How far away is the impact of these retirements on your workforce?  Are you modeling potential impacts in your strategic workforce planning?  What ARE you doing about it?

Jun 19, 2009

HCI Workforce Planning Conference Part 2: Operational vs Strategic Workforce Planning

It’s clear from the conference this week that the two schools of workforce planning are definitely diverging…

  1. Operational workforce planning, focused on metrics, reporting and forecasting
  2. Strategic workforce planning, focused on developing a measurable talent strategy

Sure, they aren’t mutually exclusive, but they are definitely distinct…so I thought it would be a good idea to remind ourselves what the difference between them are.  Besides a pretty good answer over there on WikiAnswers, we have a paper that uses this table to describe the differences between the two.  What do you think?

Item

Operational

Strategic

Need

Accurately forecast hiring and/or training needs

Develop the best talent strategies for longer term success

Timeline/Planning Horizon

Usually 12 months with a quarterly focus – matches the yearly business plan

Usually 3 years or longer – matches the organizational strategic plan

Integrated with

Annual or quarterly financial/budgeting process

Strategic planning process

Inputs

Mostly internal data, some management decisions

Wide range of internal and external information including demographics, business strategies, global trends, etc

Outputs

Staffing plans, skill gaps

Human Resource/People Strategies

Scenario Planning Approach

Uses variables to explore different models of staffing

Uses futuring techniques to question current paradigms and explore alternative futures not necessarily based on today’s approach

Forecasting

Key focus

Only part of the process – forecasting is too limited in terms of timeline and scope to be the core of the process

Segmentation Focus

Internal demand

Internal and external, demand and supply are all segmented

Skills

Competencies may be audited or gathered at an individual level

Strategic Capabilities analyzed and gathered at the group level

Performed by

HR or staffing organization with input from the business

Business, facilitated by HR

Focus

Operational Management – Line and BU Managers

Strategic Management – Executive and Board

Aligns to

Business Plan

Strategic Plan

Terms used

“Predict”, “Calculate”

“Explore”, “Design”

Jun 18, 2009

HCI Workforce Planning Conference Part 1: Evolving WFP landscape

I went to the Human Capital Institute’s workforce planning conference this week, and of course that many case studies and practitioners in that place will stimulate a few posts…starting with this.

Wow, how workforce planning has evolved.  At this event, people seriously discussed environment scanning, scenario exploration, operational vs strategic workforce planning (more on that next post) and lots of other good things.  Workforce planning has evolved so that those terms and techniques have become part of the language of workforce planning, not the exotic new items they used to be.  Sure, people are still talking about metrics and reporting, but more and more of the really successful case studies really understand that there are qualitative things in the mix as well.

Exciting stuff!